1/4/2024 0 Comments Lds scriptures for pocket pc![]() ![]() “I said, ‘You’re crazy, I don’t want to hear it, you’re going to destroy your career, go away,’” Feldman recalled. ![]() And once he pieced it together and began reading, he had an odd feeling. But to reconstruct the full paleo-Hebrew text, Dershowitz first had to track down scattered transcriptions and a handful of drawings of one fragment. Those basics had been known since Shapira’s time, when newspapers published translations of his manuscript. Most important, it includes the historical narrative but none of the laws beyond the Ten Commandments, which appear in somewhat different form. The Shapira text - which Dershowitz calls the Valediction of Moses, or V - differs from canonical Deuteronomy in a number of striking ways. Since the 19th century, scholars have held that Deuteronomy (or its nucleus of laws) was that book, which in fact had been composed shortly beforehand to justify the centralization of worship at the Temple and other priestly reforms. The Hebrew Bible states that during the reign of Josiah, around 622 B.C.E., priests discovered an ancient “Book of the Law” in the Temple in Jerusalem. Ironically, Deuteronomy itself has been described as a “pious forgery,” as scholars call works created to justify a particular belief or practice. In his address, Moses recalls their history, and emphasizes the importance of following the laws, including the Ten Commandments (first revealed in Exodus), which he then restates. He found himself curious about something most articles on the topic barely discussed: its contents.ĭeuteronomy, as it appears in the Bible, contains Moses’ farewell sermon to the Israelites before they enter the Promised Land. Nearly four years ago, while finishing his dissertation at Hebrew University in Jerusalem, he stumbled on an article online about it. is a forgery unless Monsieur Ganneau did it!”ĭershowitz’s own obsession with the Shapira manuscript began as something of a lark. “Although I am not yet convinced that the M.s. “I do not think that I will be able to survive this shame,” he wrote. But in a letter to Ginsburg, Shapira professed his innocence, and pointed the finger at his old nemesis. Sharp-Eye-Ra,” with forger’s ink still dripping from his finger. Still, for some, his Jewish origins rendered him suspicious.Īfter the British Museum issued its damning verdict on the Deuteronomy fragments, the satirical magazine Punch ran a cartoon showing the museum’s expert, Christian David Ginsburg, apprehending a stereotypically hooknosed “Mr. By the time he announced the Deuteronomy fragments, he had sold some 250 apparently genuine ones to the British Museum. In 1873, after Shapira sold a large collection of newly “discovered” Moabite pottery to the German government, Clermont-Ganneau publicly denounced them - correctly - as “false from beginning to end.”īy 1883, Shapira had re-established himself as a respected dealer of antique Hebrew manuscripts. The showdown with Clermont-Ganneau was not the first time the two men had tangled. In her 1914 autobiographical novel, “The Little Daughter of Jerusalem,” his daughter Maria recalled how Shapira would return from artifact-hunting trips proclaiming himself “King of the Desert.” Soon, he started selling antiquities out of his back room, and cultivating grandiose ambitions. In 1861, he opened a souvenir shop on Christian Street in the Old City, offering palm fronds and kitschy souvenirs to tourists.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |